How much value does this service touchpoint deliver compared to the resources it requires to deliver it?
It’s a really simple question, but one that we all should be asking more often.
The sustainability pioneer Buckminster “Bucky” Fuller believed that progress comes from doing more with less – aiming to deliver greater value while using fewer resources.
I was chewing over this idea and wondered how it could be applied to make digital services more sustainable.
Every touch point of a service should deliver value to the people who use it and to the organisation that provides it.
Every touch point also consumes energy and resources in order to deliver it.
So what if we evaluated every touch point, page or feature based on:
– Value (to users and the organisation)
– Energy (the energy it takes to deliver it)
By plotting your touch points on a simple 2×2 you can create what I’m calling a ‘Fuller map’

‘Fuller zone’ : High value, low energy. Protect and maintain these touch points.
‘Optimise’ : High value, high energy. Optimise these to keep the value and reduce energy usage.
‘Waste’ : Low value, high energy. Redesign or remove them.
‘Ignore’ : Low value, low energy. These are low priority, stick them on the backlog.
I think this map will be a useful tool to get the conversation started and to help teams decide where to focus their efforts.
It could also come in handy for service assessments to demonstrate that you’re taking positive steps to deliver a more sustainable service.
So take a moment to think about your key touch points and ask yourself…
Are we creating enough value to justify the resources we are using?
I’d love to hear what you think and how you might put this into action to help make your digital services more sustainable. 💪
